Pages

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Zork

The classic text adventure book - now online.

With a very interesting analysis of the topology too....

8 comments:

  1. The links don't work, Zoe... :-(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Try now - if you get a 403 error, just re-type the URL in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's http://samizdat.cc/cyoa/ then press "play"

    ReplyDelete
  4. i have missed this damn game so much over the years.

    You have made my week!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Uhm.

    i take it back. That isn't the Zork i know. The one i played was a computer game on the Commodore 64 (if memory serves).

    That link seems to be a bad version of Choose Your Own Adventure...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, you want the *digital* one, not the dead-tree version?

    Try here.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh dear! So much of my earlier life was lost to that game! When I was dungeon master for it, I was systems programmer for an IBM 168 mainframe. Gawd big iron was impressive back then!

    I spent so much time with Colossal Cave, as it was known then, that it was almost named as a co-respondent in my divorce!

    Thanks Zoe! It has been too long since I have played that game. I fear another day of lost productivity is upon me!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Zork was fun to play. This got me to thinking and I recalled that I still have my orgional 5 1/4" floppy disk of it. So dug it out and here's a photo of it: http://twitpic.com/1721xd
    Still have a couple 5 1/4" floppy drives laying around and old 486 pc laying around. So I could put together system with Win95 on it and run it in a dos box. But will have to check you the online version.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.

Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.

Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.

As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.