tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post6635698151257488644..comments2024-02-20T15:17:48.594+11:00Comments on A.E.Brain: Two Papers on Legal Issues for TS and IS peopleZoe Brainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13712045376060102538noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-70724538186554875452010-12-25T00:59:38.795+11:002010-12-25T00:59:38.795+11:00Brilliant...Thank you Zoe for this expose. I never...Brilliant...Thank you Zoe for this expose. I never cease to be amazed by the arrogance ignorance, and sometimes deliberate twisting of logic, and facts to promote a bigoted conservagenda.Cynthianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-53939987003321946762010-12-24T10:36:20.214+11:002010-12-24T10:36:20.214+11:00He is also sloppy at legal analysis-
He says Ke...He is also sloppy at legal analysis- <br /><br />He says Kevin was overturned on Appeal - wrong, it was upheld- thats why we have legal marriage for opposite sex trans people here in australia .<br /><br />He says the previous family law court decision on intersex marriage In marriage C , D detemined that surgery did not alter sex - wrong it said nothing of the sort-it actually was decided on the basis of non diclosure (for want of a better word) the other party thought she was marrying a man. And in Kevins case the full court said it would be decided differently now ( ie taking Kevin's case and a UK case into account .........<br /><br />Grrrr<br /><br />helenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-6289657847131960622010-12-24T07:00:22.327+11:002010-12-24T07:00:22.327+11:00At some point I hope such lawyers will be called t...At some point I hope such lawyers will be called to task for their repeated begging the question on matters of biology. It's not like there is no evidence flatly contradicting assertions like "transsexuals are born with chromosomal and phenotypic consistency." And it's not like this evidence is too new to be considered. The groundbreaking Zhou article regarding transsexual brain difference appeared in <i>Nature</i> (no obscure journal, that) eleven years prior to Staver's "Objective Criteria" article. And as you well know it was the first of many subsequent studies elaborating on the matter.<br /><br />Those who allow bald-faced logical fallacy to form the basis of their laws deserve all the chaos they unleash. Unfortunately that chaos spreads well beyond the guilty parties.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-7880404491075760622010-12-24T03:36:19.353+11:002010-12-24T03:36:19.353+11:00Thank you for re-posting about the '96 article...Thank you for re-posting about the '96 article! Very very helpful to me, I am completely ignorant on that area.Anniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07052408666261466294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-57653873773610241712010-12-24T03:29:52.824+11:002010-12-24T03:29:52.824+11:00We all have multiple sexes, we have chromosomal se...We all have multiple sexes, we have chromosomal sex, genetic sex, genital sex, hormonal sex, and neuro sex. There's probably more I'm not thinking of right now. But even then, the sex in all of those cases can be ambiguous.<br /><br />I really wish we could get past the binary and see at as a convenient lie.Venenoreply@blogger.com