tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post8691798320370432890..comments2024-02-20T15:17:48.594+11:00Comments on A.E.Brain: Today's BattlesZoe Brainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13712045376060102538noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-86837472899808743192009-08-25T23:52:12.922+10:002009-08-25T23:52:12.922+10:00You opine: "And at Perlo II: philosophy and l...You opine: "And at Perlo II: philosophy and literature, introducing some Science to Arts majors. Which seems to be going remarkably smoothly, even though it's rather like the test described in Parkinson's Law Chapter 5:<br /><br /> They will finally be invited to try their eloquence on a Baptist Congress, the object being to induce those present to rock and roll. Those who fail will be liquidated."<br /><br />I must be losing it this morning because I do not see the connection between your "Today's Battles" post and the discussion over at Perlo.Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06338078632530539703noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5573426.post-28273233475519069822009-08-04T23:08:50.944+10:002009-08-04T23:08:50.944+10:00Zoe, They are similar and I only have one argumen...Zoe, They are similar and I only have one argument. If allowing a person to surgically remove their limb results in that person being considered disabled, then there is an adaquate grounds to say no to allowing the surgery.<br /><br />For most people, the loss of a limb would imply a disability and allow that person to be considered disabled in the eyes of U.S. law.<br /><br />AudreyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com