It's a fairly advanced paper, far beyond my skills (which have rusted after 20 years of disuse), so I could only understand about 10% of it without consulting old textbooks. Even then, I'd have to become familiar with advances and terminology in maths that have only become current in the last two decades. For most people, it would appear as mystifying as, say, Derrida at his worst. Just read the Abstract (below) to see what I mean.
BRANCH RINGS, THINNED RINGS, TREE ENVELOPING RINGSAlas, some of the concepts really do require their own special terminology: the object is not to Blind with Science, or Baffle with BS, it's to communicate very exact and abstruse ideas to people who have the right background.
Abstract. We develop the theory of “branch algebras”, which are infinite dimensional associative algebras that are isomorphic, up to taking subrings of finite codimension, to a matrix ring over themselves. The main examples come from groups acting on trees.
In particular, we construct an algebra over the field of two elements, that is finitely generated, prime, infinite-dimensional but with all proper quotients finite, has a recursive presentation, is graded, and has Gelfand-Kirillov dimension 2.
The interesting thing about it is the first line :
Rings are powerful tools, and those arising from groups have been studied in great length [32, 39, 40]. The first author’s long-awaited monograph on the topic should prove illuminating [5].The references,
[5] Bilbo Baggins, There and Back Again. . . A Hobbit’s Tale by Bilbo Baggins, in preparation.And, of course, the co-authors.
...˙
[32] Donald S. Passman, The algebraic structure of group rings, Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York, 1977, ISBN 0-471-02272-1, Pure and Applied Mathematics.
...
[39] John Ronald Reuel Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
[40] _________, The Hobbit , Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999.
BILBO BAGGINS AND LAURENT BARTHOLDISeen via Yet Another Weird SF Fan.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.
Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.
Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.
As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.