A Russian space transport ship failed to fully raise the orbit of the International Space Station in preparation for next month's docking of a supply ship, a Russian news agency reported.No need to panic.
Alexander Kireyev, head of the ballistic coordination group at Russia's Mission Control outside Moscow, said the docked Progress transport ship was supposed to raise the orbiting station by about 4.5km, but the ship's engines were not strong enough.
"Eight approach and attitude engines of Progress M-50 that is docked to the ISS were turned on at 17:12 Moscow time and worked for 549 seconds as was planned," Kireyev was quoted as saying by ITAR-Tass.
"However, the thrust they generated was not as big as was expected."
He said the station was raised by only 2.7km, but that it would still be enough to allow a new transport ship, scheduled to be launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on December 23, to dock.
The station, which is now orbiting about 358km above the earth, has dropped about 7km in the past two weeks due to strong magnetic storms.OK, now we can panic. Or rather, start to get concerned. A few more months like that, and there will be all sorts of problems with attitude control, due to the increased resistance from the not-quite-as-near-as-it-was-to-vacuum near-vacuum. The ISS will start to slow down faster, leading to a lower orbit, leading to more resistance, leading to... well, it will Skylab in, eventually. Not for a while though.
7 km drop in 2 weeks is a bit of a worry though. Especially if someone's slipped up with the calculations, and a Progress can only claw back less than half of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.
Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.
Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.
As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.