A medical device which allows a woman to sleep by switching off an implant in her brain has been stolen.I'm sure they'll be able to. Just look up the records, find the frequencies the controller operates on, get a new controller and change the firmware or hardware frequency setting accordingly.
Rita Carlisle, 53, from Knaphill, Surrey, suffers from a condition called essential tremor.
The stolen remote control gadget sends out pulses to calm the condition and can be switched off so she can rest.
Ms Carlisle, who now struggles to sleep, was carrying the device and £600 cash in a handbag which was stolen in Farnborough, Hants, on 23 December.
She said: "I'm extremely tired, I'm getting three to four hours' sleep a night, I can't turn the machine off.
"I had my second operation on 13 December and it was my first outing after leaving hospital.
"I just wish the people who stole the machine would give it back.
"They have totally ruined Christmas and the New Year. There was �600 in my bag as well so they have had a good Christmas out of me."
Ms Carlisle says she is hopeful, but not certain, that the hospital caring for her - the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in central London - will be able to replace the device.
Very, very good records are kept of frequencies and codes used to program and control therapeutic devices. Accidental reprogramming of heart pacemakers etc is obviously undesirable.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.
Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.
Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.
As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.