Pages

Wednesday 3 August 2011

Indian man has hysterectomy

From the UK Telegraph:
An Indian farmer and father of two had a hysterectomy after doctors discovered a "full female reproductive system" in his lower abdomen.
...
The Indian man, identified as Ryalu, was admitted to a hospital near Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, after complaining of severe stomach pains.

Doctors suspected a normal hernia, but when they carried out an exploratory operation they were shocked to discover it had been caused by a female uterus, ovaries, Fallopian tubes, a cervix and underdeveloped vaginal tissue.
I wonder what his scar looks like? One from bikini line to breastbone perchance? And at least they told him afterwards.

I still don't know what was removed along with my gallbladder back in 1980. Just that it didn't belong in a body that was supposed to be male - but I can't imagine it could have been anything nearly as completely developed.

These things happen. Nature's not quite as tidy as most believe.

4 comments:

  1. It'd be interesting to know what his DNA was, if that goes along with being XX or XXY or if he was regular old XY.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I doubt anyone had the foresight to reserve the removed tissue for typing. Oh, by the way, thank you for the positive comments you sent to the five girls assaulted in Washington DC.

    ReplyDelete
  3. did dr. m italiano from india make up this crazy story for you also zoe? was this one od his/her patients?

    ReplyDelete
  4. What's crazy about it? There's a number of syndromes that can cause this.

    In other news, the world is not Flat, the little lights in the sky are actually huge balls of hot gas trillions of kilometers away, and very tiny organisms called bacteria cause many diseases. No matter how improbable any of that may sound to you.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.

Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.

Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.

As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.