Pages

Monday 9 July 2012

NAB Honesty Shouldn't Go Unrewarded



From the Daily Mail

The shopping centre prank is the latest in a string of NAB stunts. Another experiment involved the bank building a coffee stand on a busy Melbourne street, where the barista deliberately gave all customers $5 too much in change for their coffees.

Every single person immediately returned the money.

The barista then changed tactics and began insulting customers - asking one lactose-intolerant woman when she ‘decided she had that condition’, and telling a smartly dressed young man that he would no longer fit into his suit if he kept drinking moccas.

Despite the obnoxious comments 91 per cent STILL returned the extra change.

5 comments:

  1. I find it completely normal and typical of a bank to do this, they do have all our money!

    This merely reflects humanity's honest grasp of reality.

    In the end the banks will win!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I forgot to say;
    Kindness, seen by a human, is almost always regarded as a kind of weakness in another human.

    Such IS the life of all humans.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Never sell yourself too cheap. Most people have a price and it is more than $5.

    CDF

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm curious if the result would have been the same if they did the experiment in Sydney...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does this mean Diogenes didn't need that lamp after all?

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.

Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.

Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.

As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.