Pages

▼

Friday 14 February 2014

You probably missed this. A game changer.

It's a long video. You can't afford to miss it. The world has changed when we weren't looking.

If that's too long to watch, and too full of marketing hype, here's how it works.

at

2 comments:

  1. beneficiiFriday, February 14, 2014 10:36:00 am

    Kosilek has just had a major blow dealt to her case, with the Circuit Court electing to rehear her case _en banc_ (i.e. by the full court):

    http://t.co/JeC8u1R0XW

    Kosilek's lawyer, Joseph Suliman, had been previously quoted thus:

    >Kosilek’s attorney, Joseph Sulman, said he does not believe there is any reason for the appeals court to hold a rehearing and disagreed with the DOC’s claim that Wolf’s decision broadened the meaning of adequate care.

    http://www.reddit.com/r/transgender/comments/1xtamu/kosilek_sex_change_ruling_to_get_new_hearing/

    This means that the reasons of the Circuit Court do not align with the reasons of Kosilek's attorney.

    This is particularly damaging for Kosilek because _en banc_ rehearings by a Circuit Court are rare, granted only when, to put it simply, there have been major potential issues with the way the case has been handled previously by the District Court and the Circuit Court panel that heard the case.

    If Kosilek loses this rehearing, then I think that would be the end of her case. I would find it very unlikely that the Supreme Court would grant certiorari.

    ReplyDelete
  2. beneficiiMonday, February 17, 2014 12:46:00 pm

    I write on the issue of the recent Hambrook case:

    http://beneficii.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-single-counterexample-is-all-it-takes.html

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters - please add a signature (doesn't have to be your real name) on each post of yours. Anne O'Namus, Norm D. Ploom, Angry from Kent, Demosthenes, or even your real initials, it doesn't matter.

Commenters are expected to be polite to each other, but the same standard doesn't apply to comments regarding me.

Australian commenters are very very strongly advised to publish anonymously. Sydney alone has more defamation actions than the entire USA and UK. Nearly double that of the UK in fact.

As Google does not reliably inform me that a comment has been posted, and I have no control over first publication, I assert that all comments are innocently disseminated under the NSW DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - SECT 32 and similar acts.