The woman on the left is an ally in the present fight against mandatory contraception coverage. (I don't think I would agree with the political opinions of her great-grandparents.)
The woman on the right is the great-grandmother of people who will fight to keep circumcision legal. (I don't think I would agree with her political opinions.)
Made some good comments about how those who are denied medically necessary treatment should file a request with HHS in the same manner as was the case for sex reassignment surgery; I also commented that all 3 of the board members that made the decision were Republican-appointed (which seemed to cause confusion in one of the other users). (Basically, they've been saying it has all been Obama and the Democrats, but they give Obama and the Democrats far too much credit for finally removing this.)
"Why should employers be allowed to opt out of the law on religious grounds?" ============== In a free country that gives liberty as a right, no cultural behavior control is legal. Government is not in charge of individual morals. Forced payment to support other people's morals is not a free country it is socialist.
Actually, I am a Rocket Scientist.
Also hormonally odd (my blood has 46xy chromosomes anyway) and for most of my life, I looked male, and lived as one, trying to be the best Man a Gal could be. Anyway, in May 2005 that started changing naturally for reasons still unclear, and I'm now Zoe, not Alan : happier and more relaxed not to have to pretend any more.
UPDATE - reason now identified as the 3BHSD form of CAH.
This blog, written by a rocket scientist, is a fascinating collection of information, both personal and scientific, regarding intersex, transsexualism and related psychosocial and psychosexual issues. ... It is erudite and heartfelt. Just read the posts about the passport issue. You won't know whether to laugh, weep or crawl into a ball and rock gently in a corner - an amazing person. - David --- The reason I so appreciate bright, perceptive people - as opposed to ideologues whose intelligence does little to illuminate - is that they manage to both instruct and learn with a certain grace. Among such rarities in the transblogosphere is Zoe, whose direct speech and clear humanity always make her worth reading, even if one doesn’t always agree with her every conclusion. - Val --- The following is a request for permission to archive your A.E.Brain blog site which we have wanted to do for several years... The Library has traditionally collected items in print, but it is also committed to preserving electronic publications of lasting cultural value.... Since (1996) we have been identifying online publications and archiving those that we consider have national significance.... We would like to include A.E.Brain blog site in the PANDORA Archive... -Australian National Library
7 comments:
When government controls culture you have war.
Sims
The woman on the left is an ally in the present fight against mandatory contraception coverage. (I don't think I would agree with the political opinions of her great-grandparents.)
The woman on the right is the great-grandmother of people who will fight to keep circumcision legal. (I don't think I would agree with her political opinions.)
The difference is time.
Two sides. Same coin.
I expect the lass on the left isn't going to strap on a suicide vest and kill innocent people.
din
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/sex-change-surgery-health-care-coverage-108853.html
Made some good comments about how those who are denied medically necessary treatment should file a request with HHS in the same manner as was the case for sex reassignment surgery; I also commented that all 3 of the board members that made the decision were Republican-appointed (which seemed to cause confusion in one of the other users). (Basically, they've been saying it has all been Obama and the Democrats, but they give Obama and the Democrats far too much credit for finally removing this.)
The woman on the left is an ally in the present fight against mandatory contraception coverage.
An ally of yours, maybe, but not of mine. Why should employers be allowed to opt out of the law on religious grounds?
On what do you base your opinion that the woman on the left is unlikely to kill any innocent people?
athel
"Why should employers be allowed to opt out of the law on religious grounds?"
==============
In a free country that gives liberty as a right, no cultural behavior control is legal.
Government is not in charge of individual morals. Forced payment to support other people's morals is not a free country it is socialist.
Carney
Post a Comment